Don't mind at all.  Thanks.

I've griped about this enough that I thought I would share a solution.  For years, I have used a word processor called Jarte.  It is built on Word Pad, but is so much more feature rich: tabs, pasteboard, etc (the link above is to the feature set for the free version).  I use the pro version mostly to support the work, but it has a few more good features like auto-outline, split screen, auto-cap, etc.

Others have suggested using something like TinySpell, ASpell, etc.  I didn't like Tiny, nor do I like copy/paste, spell check, copy/paste.  I was browsing the manual for something else and saw Jarte's Hot Connect feature.  This is included in the free version.

With hot connect you activate it and then in any other program you hit alt-F7 (or define a different one) and Jarte copies the text, opens a new tab, you spell check and click save (or ctrl-s) and it copies it back to the original window (in this case Cintra).

If this were a forum on best word processors (like LifeHacker does) I would, and have, recommended Jarte.  Even if you don't need something like Hot Connect, try it.

I will be using Cintra much more often as a primary notes DB now that I discovered Hot Connect.

(Standard disclaimer: not associated..affiliated..employed by, blah, blah, blah).

Mr. Jenter,

Thank you for CintaNotes.  I recently bought a lifetime subscription because I intend to use Cinta as long as it's around.  I wrote one of the comments above almost a year ago, and I would use Cinta more if it had spell check.  I hate Evernote, but I use RightNote and ConnectedText more than Cintra.  Rather than be my main notes DB, Cinta is just a quick collection bucket for me.

I realize that the discussion has reached the point where it is pointless to continue it because you don't find the arguments for spell check persuasive, and that is entirely your prerogative.  (Interesting.  I am dyslexic and can't spell prerogative worth a tinker's damn.  Good thing my browser spell checks.)

I am grateful to you and your team for both your skill and effort, and I have shown I am willing to pay for your product.  If votes count do not the votes of paying customers count?  

Of course there will be a different definition of essential for every user, but you seem to me to be talking past the issue.  Asking for votes on this forum is barely better than not asking at all.  There are, in fact, many better ways to solicit feedback.  I am willing to wager the percentage of no answers would be >75% if you asked (in any language): Would you be willing to try a note taking application that did not have spell check?

Implementing spell check for English speakers would not be discriminative.  I may not be able to spell discriminative without spell check, but I know what it means, and it's no more discriminative than my local Starbucks having cashiers who only speak English.  Many would consider expanding their customer base in one place a good and necessary first step before going regional or global.

Further, RAM, bandwidth and storage being what it is these days I am not certain users would find an increase in size frustrating.

I also use Linux, and on Windows I use open source when it meets my demands.  I understand and value the work developers do and about the only software I don't routinely support even if free is browser addons, and I support some of them (like Quick Fox Notes).

Again, thanks, and Cinta is your product and I like it and use it and it's your choice what features to implement.  I just don't find your arguments persuasive.  If Cinta is how you like it and you are satisfied with its revenue stream, great!

Regards,
Bo Grimes

I am not sure 'votes' is a good way to determine a feature.  If people download and try it and discover it is lacking a feature that is a must for them they won't use it.  If they know it lacks a feature in advance they won't try it.  Votes are cast only by those who use it, visit the forums, know there is voting, and decide something is important enough to request it or vote it up.

I purchased Cinta a long time ago.  I assumed any modern software that deals with text has spell checking, at least as a plugin, like Notepad++.  I like it and keep wanting to use it as a primary "anything bucket."  For quick notes spell check doesn't really matter, but for stuff I want to develop later it does.

One feature I love about Cinta, that many other "buckets" don't do is the ability to work on a note in its own screen.  This indicates to me that it is designed for long text, at least as a possibility.  So, then when I copy and paste the note into something designed for more complex documents, like Scrivner, LibreOffice, or ConnectedText, I have to correct all the spelling errors.

I have both Aspell and Hunspell installed, but I don't know how to configure it to real time check spelling in Cinta, or even check it on demand.  If I were going to do that I could just as easily copy the note into Jarte (my primary RTF application) correct it and then paste it back in.

In which case I might as well just take notes in Jarte and then paste them into Cinta for tagging and organizing, but that's not what I want Cinta for because then Cinta would be a middle man in my personal workflow.

Any progress on this?  It's basically the one feature that prevents me from using Cinta more than I want.  Spell check seems to be a feature that is not well supported in many note taking applications that are not bloatware, like OneNote and Evernote.  Maybe developers who live in editors and IDEs don't think it's that important because it would be annoying in a programming language.