Teie kommentaarid

Ok let's do the following:
1) Let's combine all Keyword-related ideas into one "Add Remarks (comments, keywords) field."
The annotations idea is a bit different because it implies possibility to annotate blocks of text and not the note as a whole.
2) Let's rename this idea to: Generalize the Link field into Remarks (comment, keywords) field
I generally agree with your conclusion. However we also need some kind of threshold, otherwise there will be too many features to be implemented right away. Right now I consider ideas with score less than 10 as not ready for implementation (this obviously doesn't apply to bugs)  .

I also think that we need to take into consideration the percentage of downvotes. E.g. if we have two ideas both having score of 15, but one has 20 upvotes and 5 downvotes, and other has just 15 upvotes, I think it is clear that the second one should be implemented first, because the votes are more unanimous.
Maybe it will fit the bill if the links are not in the text but in a separate field?
Please take a look here: http://roadmap.cintanotes.com/topic/104471-note-to-note-generalize-link-field-adding-power-and-flexibility/
Well I used the term "mouse-oriented" more in the "not-keyboard-oriented" sense. Of course the visual indicator function is also very important, however since there is no keyboard shortcut for Ctrl+Clicking on a tag, where probably won't be a shortcut of double-clicking on a tag.