IMO moving to a more universal and *standard format* like markdown is a good justification for adding or shifting to such a formatting concept as markdown. I do not believe the argument that "we don't need" it - is progressive enough if it would make CN more standard and inclusive with immediate utility for a broader audience of users. The same argument could be made for having another note taking system like CN, obviously we don't need CN, but we love it - and use it *because* it has progressive features that give it more utility for us.
I heartily promote the idea of CN supporting markdown in a 2-mode view approach which I believe would make CN generally more useful and valuable to a broader audience - which over time has come to also include myself as an existing user.
IMO moving to a more universal and *standard format* like markdown is a good justification for adding or shifting to such a formatting concept as markdown. I do not believe the argument that "we don't need" it - is progressive enough if it would make CN more standard and inclusive with immediate utility for a broader audience of users. The same argument could be made for having another note taking system like CN, obviously we don't need CN, but we love it - and use it *because* it has progressive features that give it more utility for us.
I heartily promote the idea of CN supporting markdown in a 2-mode view approach which I believe would make CN generally more useful and valuable to a broader audience - which over time has come to also include myself as an existing user.