Tus comentarios
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your comment. I agree that checkboxes in notes can be useful.
However even now I can get by with crossing list items out using Cltr+K; did you try this?
Thanks for your comment. I agree that checkboxes in notes can be useful.
However even now I can get by with crossing list items out using Cltr+K; did you try this?
I think that such setting should be possible. It's equally easy to export as TXT or RTF.
Great, then we are settled on the implementation! Thanks for your help. Now all we need is more votes :)
Ok then I guess that if note contains rich formatting, a warning should be displayed that after editing in external editor all formatting will be lost.
Thanks a lot, Chris! This is very useful info.
Hello Bo,
Thanks a lot for your comment, and really sorry that I didn't reply the previous time - this happens not often, but sometimes I can forget to reply.
Also thanks a lot for going Lifetime PRO, I appeciate your support!
Your points are valid. Ok, let's assume that my arguments about size bloat and language dependence are not persuasive.
Further, let's suppose I take this all onboard and implement spell check in CN 3.0. After that I get a lot of angry mails asking me what the heck I ignored all features from top 10 or even top 25. What should I answer? "Bo Grimes and Colin Smith promised me that implemeting this feature will double sales" doesn't sound like a good excuse. "It's my program and I decide what to implement" is another possibility, but then again people will see that voting doesn't work and will think that regular asking, reminding and begging is the way to go to get the needed feature. Do I want this to happen? No.
Basically we'll return to the chaos with feature requests which we had before the voting on the roadmap. Now the rules may not be perfect, but at least they are clear and transparent - if you want a feature, you go and vote, you bring 100 of your friends to vote, etc.
Other argument: currently we don't have the resources needed to conduct a full-scale marketing research. So we can only guess which features will increase sales, and which will be barely noticed. Votes are not perfect, but I think that they are still a little bit correlated with what people need and want.
Thanks a lot for your comment, and really sorry that I didn't reply the previous time - this happens not often, but sometimes I can forget to reply.
Also thanks a lot for going Lifetime PRO, I appeciate your support!
Your points are valid. Ok, let's assume that my arguments about size bloat and language dependence are not persuasive.
Further, let's suppose I take this all onboard and implement spell check in CN 3.0. After that I get a lot of angry mails asking me what the heck I ignored all features from top 10 or even top 25. What should I answer? "Bo Grimes and Colin Smith promised me that implemeting this feature will double sales" doesn't sound like a good excuse. "It's my program and I decide what to implement" is another possibility, but then again people will see that voting doesn't work and will think that regular asking, reminding and begging is the way to go to get the needed feature. Do I want this to happen? No.
Basically we'll return to the chaos with feature requests which we had before the voting on the roadmap. Now the rules may not be perfect, but at least they are clear and transparent - if you want a feature, you go and vote, you bring 100 of your friends to vote, etc.
Other argument: currently we don't have the resources needed to conduct a full-scale marketing research. So we can only guess which features will increase sales, and which will be barely noticed. Votes are not perfect, but I think that they are still a little bit correlated with what people need and want.
Thanks for your elaboration. This could be an interesting approach. However I don't know what to do with text formatting in this scenario?
Servicio de atención al cliente por UserEcho
I can't quite reproduce this - for me the dropdown becomes a drop-up as soon as there not enough space on the bottom. Doesn't it happen for you? Or maybe this is an issue of a threshold which is a bit off?