Closed because can't reproduce and no upvotes in 5 months.

Hackadelic, thanks for your message that raises very interesting questions. Yes, having a general concept for links would greatly enhance CN's usability.

[1] One thing is to keep in mind: I want to avoid at all costs splitting the note view into "viewing" and "editing" (Wiki-like syntax as I understand it requires this). There are two viable options: 1) requiring writing links explicitly or 2) providing a link editor (like in MS Word).

[2] Any suggestions here?

It is the latter. Please read the original discussion for more info :)

Well it is not exactly "limited". See FAQ in CN Help:
"How can I change the width of the tag sidebar?
    Change the app.mainframe.tagsidebar.width parameter in the cintanotes.settings file to the desired width in pixels."

And I like the autosize idea, added it as separate request: http://roadmap.cintanotes.com/feedback/9090-/

CN automatically timestamps notes with their creation date and time. Why is this not enough?

Tabs + Hierarchic tags will deal with that ;) Hierarchic notes - no thanks.

It will most probably be implemented as an optional extension (plugin) or even as a standalone app.

I'm against any wiki- or forum-like formatting, since this requires splitting the view into "source" and "final"

Thanks for the input. I'm actually more inclined to support "notes as tasks" strategy, it is IMO more flexible and is more likely to fit the bill for the majority of users.

"Planned" state only means that this feature is accepted for implementation. It does not mean that the implementation plan is ready.
CintaNotes design philosophy dictates that all features which significantly influence performance are optional. Also the features which have "external" tag are planned as separate extension modules.