Tus comentarios

Ok I'll investigate the possibilities.. But this bug needs to get several votes first)

Simplenote supports some Markdown, so probably we could go that route.

But all in all, it is really simple and now even sections need to be emulated via specially named tags.

Regarding attachments, seems we'll have to get creative, since Simplenote doesn't support attaching any custom data to notes (even Uids now have to go into the note's text, which annoys the heck out of many people, but is necessary for correct note linking).

I reckon there will be several options for the user to choose:

1) Base64 encode attachments directly into note's text - ugly, but will ensure no info is lost;

2) Store attachments separately in a (possibly Dropbox-synced) folder

3) Don't sync attachments at all (when no full-duplex sync is necessary)


I doubt we could do better here, but if you have any suggestions, you're welcome.

This dilemma is partly the reason why it takes so long to implement attachments.

Hm, what would be the desired behavior?

Would you prefer the formatting to be stripped away? Then after syncing back, the formatting would disappear in CN as well.

Got it, thanks a lot, we're already investigating..

Hi Chris!

Thanks for the report. I assume you're now on CN 2.4.

I've tried to reproduce the problem, but no luck - in my case, the note gets deleted from SN. 

If you could provide more info (or maybe even a debug log), this would be great! thanks